Global Policy Forum

A Worry for Beijing That Goes Beyond Cities

Print
China’s gap between rich and poor is growing at an alarming rate, and is prompting government authorities to make changes in an attempt to prevent social unrest. While economic reform has raised incomes for many Chinese, making some phenomenally wealthy, scores of millions remain mired in deep poverty. The growing gulf is breeding resentment, which may prompt broader class conflict.



By Alan Wheatley

New York Times
April 25, 2011

The fertile fields of this corner of eastern China are an unlikely microcosm of the national economy. There is not a power plant or factory in sight. Yet the area encapsulates as well as any industrial city some of the forces that are reshaping the country.

People grumble about rising prices, adding weight to the authorities’ concern that inflation could lead to unrest. Protests by 2,000 truckers in Shanghai over high fuel prices briefly turned violent last week.

The virtual absence of any farmers younger than 40 speaks to China’s urbanization. Youngsters decamp as soon as they can to work in towns near and far, leaving their aging parents to till the soil.

With the rural labor pool shrinking, wages are rising. A cheerful woman about 50 who was tending a potato field said she earned 40 renminbi, or $6, a day.

It is not a king’s ransom, but it is nearly twice as much as she was getting three years ago. At the side of the field stands her electric bike, a must-have for those with money to spare for the first time.

That she is laboring on someone else’s land points to another phenomenon sweeping China: Many households are leasing out their small plots, which results in bigger, more productive farms.

Li Tiejun, a farmer, said a peasant could earn as much in a month at a factory — about 2,000 renminbi — as he could in a year harvesting two mu of grain — 0.266 hectare, or 0.658 acre.

“There’ll be more and more big farms because all the young people are leaving and no one wants to farm anymore,” said the farmer, who works 60 mu of land.

That would be a rounding error for many farms in the United States, but it dwarfs the average plot in China. In 2009, rural households managed just 2.26 mu of land per person, according to official data.

Consolidation of land took off around Zhucheng, a thriving town in Shandong Province, in 2007.

Locals typically transfer their holdings on 10-year renewable leases, for which they get 400 renminbi a mu per year.

In one township alone, there are 30 farmers with more than 100 mu of land, according to a tobacco grower, Zhu Shumei.

She and her husband farm 300 mu of land and made about 100,000 renminbi in 2010.

Nationwide, per capita rural incomes after inflation rose 14.3 percent in the first quarter from a year earlier, double the increase in urban disposable income, thanks to higher farm prices and bigger remittances by migrant workers.

In short, China’s vast rural economy, home to more than 700 million people, seems to be doing well.

But urban China is doing much better, and the resulting inequality is a nagging concern for the ruling Communist Party.

“In some regions, we have seen encouraging signs that farmers’ incomes are rising quickly, but that doesn’t mean the nationwide urban-rural wealth gap is narrowing,” said Su Hainan with the China Association for Labor Studies, a government research institute.

Incomes in China’s cities are three to four times as high as those in the countryside.

Mr. Su said that achieving a noticeably fairer distribution could take one or two decades.

“What the government is trying to do now is to stop or at least slow the deterioration,” he said.

The chasm between town and country is part of a broader pattern of inequality, which, as measured by the Gini Coefficient, has increased to about 0.48 from 0.16 in 1978.

The figure would be zero if wealth were perfectly shared and 1 if it were in one person’s hands.

Li Shi, who is an economist at Beijing Normal University and a prominent expert on the issue, said that survey samples undercounted poor rural migrants and the wealth of the elite in the nation. He put the actual Gini Coefficient at 0.53.

“Although these estimates may still have some room for improvement, our findings nonetheless show that China’s levels of income disparity have already reached alarming levels, and that they continue to grow,” Mr. Li and his co-author, Luo Chuliang, wrote in the Economic Research Journal, a Chinese-language publication.

While scores of millions of Chinese still live in poverty, the ranks of the super-rich with wealth of at least 10 million renminbi are bulging.

The Hurun Wealth Report 2011 estimated their numbers at 960,000; a survey by the global consultants Bain & Co. and China Merchants Bank said the total number of the very wealthy would reach 590,000 this year, nearly twice as many as in 2008.

Aware that political turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa was rooted partly in glaring inequality, the Chinese government is raising minimum wages, spending more on social security and planning to take more lower-income people out of the income tax net.

But Yolanda Fernandez-Lommen, an Asian Development Bank economist in Beijing, said the proposals for change were too timid to affect the distribution of income.

To make a difference, China should rely less on regressive indirect taxation, start taxing capital gains and introduce inheritance taxes, Ms. Fernandez-Lommen said.

“Given the irrationality of the taxation/fiscal system, there is no way the income gap could be closed anytime soon,” she said.

In places like the countryside around Zhucheng, that spells a growing risk of flare-ups. A rising tide is lifting all boats for now, but Shi Xiongmin, who leases 50 mu of corn and wheat, hinted at an undercurrent of mutual resentment.

Referring to neighboring farmers who have stuck with their small plots, Mr. Shi said, “They’re very jealous, but they couldn’t make money if they tried.”


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.