Global Policy Forum

By Warren P. Strobel and Joyce M. Davis

Facing threats of a US-led invasion, Iraq yesterday hinted that it might allow United Nations weapons inspectors greater freedom to search for nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. Mohammed Aldouri, Iraq's UN ambassador, suggested that Baghdad is willing to give the inspectors unfettered access to presidential sites, the sprawling compounds belonging to Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein for which Iraq previously has demanded special status.

"I don't think that we will have a problem on that question," Aldouri said. "Certainly, we can accommodate ourselves with the UN to have free access to presidential sites." Contradicting recent statements by other Iraqi officials, Aldouri also said that Baghdad may accept a proposed UN Security Council resolution that is expected to set stiff terms for eliminating its suspected chemical, biological, nuclear and missile programs.

"We are not rejecting any resolutions of the Security Council," the Iraqi diplomat said on ABC's This Week. "We will see these resolutions. First of all, to have this resolution in our hand, and after that, we can conclude."

UN chief inspector Hans Blix agreed last week to the US position that his teams of experts would not return to Iraq until a new UN resolution is adopted.

Aldouri's remarks are unlikely to satisfy the Bush administration, which accuses Iraq of repeatedly breaking its promises. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher called it "pretty typical Iraqi behavior... . Whenever they're faced with a determined front, they start backpedaling."

Aldouri's remarks come as diplomatic pressure mounts on Baghdad, and as President Bush prepares to deliver an address at 8 tonight laying out his case about the danger Iraq poses to the United States. Bush is expected to say that war may be unavoidable if Iraq does not live up to previous commitments to disarm. He also is expected to discuss US plans for a post-Hussein Iraq.

The coming week also could prove pivotal on other fronts. The United States appeared yesterday to be moving closer to gaining allies' agreement on the new UN Security Council resolution. France and Russia have balked at a US proposal that would authorize military strikes on Iraq if Baghdad fails to meet the United Nations' terms. France has proposed a two-step process in which a second resolution authorizing force would have to be approved.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell spoke by telephone yesterday with French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin to try to find a compromise. "We're really trying to work some bridging language between where we were and where the French were," said a senior State Department official, who requested anonymity.

Congress, meanwhile, is moving toward passing a resolution giving Bush broad authority to use force against Iraq. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D., S.D.) predicted yesterday that lawmakers would support Bush overwhelmingly."It will pass, and I suspect that there will be a broad bipartisan coalition in support of it," Daschle, who has withheld his support for the measure, said on NBC's Meet the Press.

Meanwhile, Air Force Secretary James Roche said that leaders of the US armed forces had candidly voiced their concerns to Bush about the problems that could arise in a war to unseat Hussein. These include worries about relying on aging equipment and overtaxing American forces that already are committed to major operations under way in Afghanistan and elsewhere, Roche said.

Once the President makes a decision to go to war, "It's our duty to salute and say aye, aye," Roche, a former naval officer, told a conference in Leesburg, Va., sponsored by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

But senior military leaders also have a duty to fully explain to the President the risks involved in such a war because "it's one thing to talk about war in the abstract and another when it has to be done," he said. "War is not fun. It's not fun for anyone."

Roche said the United States was getting more cooperation than is known publicly from Persian Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, both for Bush's war on terrorism and a possible campaign against Iraq.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.