Global Policy Forum

Is the G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutritions suitable for combating poverty?

pospap_agle_g8_engl_fin4A new policy paper published by the German NGO Forum on Environment and Development argues that the G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa will not be able to combat hunger and food insecurity in Africa. On the contrary, the paper, to which Global Policy Forum contributed, points out that the New Alliance is mainly focused on providing multinationals with opportunities to reap profits through the creation of environments conducive to investment. Thus, the paper calls for either a radical reform of the New Alliance or its abolishment. 

JULY 18, 2013 | German NGO Forum on Environment and Development

The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa: Is the initiative by the G8 countries suitable for combating poverty?

Download Report (PDF)

The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (G8NA) was launched at the G8 Summit in Camp David at the initiative of the US government. Its declared goal is to bring 50 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa out of poverty by 2022. This is to be achieved with the aid of more private investment in agriculture. The G8NA group comprises the G8 governments, the private sector and African governments. So far, Country Cooperation Frameworks have been agreed with six African countries: Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania. Benin, Nigeria and Malawi will join the initiative this year and first steps to develop a Cooperation Framework with Senegal have been initiated.

The contents of the partnership agreements show that the predominant aim is to create conditions in African countries that are conducive to investment and to promote private-sector investment. No poverty alleviation criteria or indicators are included. Smallholders, who are supposed to benefit from the initiative, have so far not been involved in the development of the initiative. It has to be feared that the initiative is intended more to open up African markets to the purchase of agricultural commodities, access to land and the distribution of commercial seed, fertiliser and pesticides. Forum Environment & Development therefore proposes that the initiative either be radically reformed or stopped altogether.


The list of companies reads like a “Who is Who” in international agribusiness. The world’s largest grain merchants, Cargill, are represented as are the largest fertilizer manufacturers and merchants, Yara. Then there are wellknown names such as Dreyfus, Syngenta, DuPont and Monsanto as well as a number of investors from emerging economies. These include, for example, the Indian corporation United Phosphorous Limited, one of the most important phosphorous fertiliser manufacturers world-wide. Most corporations are not only active in one of the states involved but in up to four countries.


With its choice of selection criteria, the G8NA has declared its political bankruptcy. The emphasis is not on reducing the number of undernourished people, not on increasing income for small-scale producers, not on sustainable production measures and not on improvements in access to land for smallholders. If indicators had been chosen relating to the existing guidelines, such as the FAO Guidelines on the right to food (Voluntary Guidelines on the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security), the orientation of the political reforms and investment would have been fundamentally different.

Policy Paper: The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa: Is the initiative by the G8 countries suitable for combating poverty?

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.