Global Policy Forum

Launch of Electronics Watch Initiative

Electronics_WatchA new initiative called Electronics Watch launched its website 16 September 2013 as an independent, comprehensive and reliable control system that informs the public on human rights voilations surrounding the electronics industry. It is particularly based around the problem of a lack of attention being given to the employment rights violations in the electronics industry in Europe and seeks for measures to be taken by raising awareness.

18 October, 2013 |, WEED

Electronics Watch. Improving working conditions in the global electronics industry

The electronics industry is one of the fastest growing global industries. It is widely known and accepted now that despite the modern and clean image the industry has, the working conditions are often appalling.
Local governments and universities are large-scale consumers of electronics products such as computers, laptops, mobile phones, tablets and other telecommunication equipment, not forgetting printers, copiers, servers and so on. Together public buyers have considerable buying power. If they join forces they can also create significant leverage to influence structural improvement in the industry. A handful of public institutions from across Europe are acting as pioneers in the rethinking and promotion of a new type of Public Procurement, more sustainable and socially responsible. Not only this, but they are demonstrating responsible use of public money, bringing added value to their purchasing practices emphasising social inclusion and political coherence, and providing a leading example for both citizens and companies.

Labour rights in the electronics industry
Parallel to the growth of the electronics industry and the increasing outsourcing of production to low-wage countries, unions and NGOs have been monitoring the human and labour rights situation in the sector. Several networks of civil society organisations have emerged. Over the last years, numerous research reports coming from these networks, as well as the bout of suicides and suicide attempts at electronics factories in China, have drawn the world’s attention to gross labour violations, including:

  • Health and safety problems: there have been many cases amongst workers of serious professional diseases such as cancer, leukemia, liver and kidney failure and miscarriages amongst workers as a result of prolonged exposed to dangerous toxic substances, not having the correct protective gear, and having to stand for long hours during their shift.
  • No living wage: workers earn only the minimum wage for full-time work at the factory even while minimum wage levels are far too low to live on.
  • Excessive working hours: during peak periods it is not unusual for workers to work 12 hours per day, six to seven days per week.
  • Forced overtime: workers are not in the position to refuse overtime.
  • Punitive fines: excessive wage deductions in the form of punitive fines for mistakes made. As corporate grievance mechanisms are few and not-effective, workers cannot get redress for afflicted wrongs.
  • Contract labour: there is a growing trend to use labour agencies to supply workers in the electronics industry. These workers earn less than regular workers and have fewer rights, such as no paid sick leave, no vacation days, and no job security. The latter makes it impossible to defend labour rights.
  • Abuse of vulnerable worker groups: increasingly migrant workers and student interns are put to work as regular working but with less rights and less pay.
  • Disrespect of union rights: unions are not allowed in most electronics companies, attempts at organising can even be dangerous, making it impossible for workers to improve their conditions. Workers are not in the position to engage with factory management, let alone to collectively negotiate wages or working conditions

What is needed?
Existing approaches are clearly failing to combat poverty and human rights abuses in the electronics industry. Despite the guidance provided by the UN Guiding Principles of Business and Human Rights, governments are failing in their state duty to protect human rights. Companies are struggling to live up to their responsibility to protect human rights. Corporate codes of conduct and social auditing policies and practices fail in transparency and effectiveness. Currently there is no comprehensive, credible and independent monitoring system for the electronics industry that involves workers and local civil society organisations. Public sector buyers with a will to act on labour rights issues do not have an effective way to do so as their have insufficient leverage over brands companies and manufacturers.

As such, there is a clear need to design a system whereby public institutions by means of their procurement decisions will have a real and considerable impact on company behaviour and on the lives
of workers. To meet this need, a number of European organisations are partnering, under the coordination of the Spanish NGO SETEM, to embark on the formation of a consortium called Electronics Watch, an independent organisation monitoring working conditions in the global electronics industry to enable socially responsible public purchasing in Europe. Electronics Watch will bring together public sector buyers and local monitoring organisations. On the basis of a fee, affiliated public sector buyers are assured of up-to-date information about their suppliers, monitoring of local working conditions and structured ways of responding to detected non-compliances. Electronics Watch is closely following the tried-and-tested model of the Workers Rights Consortium ( for the garments sector in the US, which combines the procurement leverage of its members to incentivise sustainable and fair supply chains, by demanding compliance with international labour rights of their suppliers.

For the full article click here:

Electronics Watch website:

WEED news article (English):


FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.