Global Policy Forum

By Andrew Murray *

The words of Paul Bremer, Washington's overlord in Iraq, need no "sexing up". "We are going to fight them and impose our will on them and we will capture or... kill them until we have imposed law and order on this country," he declared at the weekend. "We dominate the scene and we will continue to impose our will on this country."

Neither General Dyer at Amritsar nor General Westmoreland in Vietnam could have put it any clearer. Welcome to the new colonialism. Bremer's words are not just bluster. US forces are now engaged in massive search-and-destroy sweeps in central and northern Iraq against forces opposing their rule.

While the Westminster village remains riveted by the Campbell-BBC pillow fight, it is the real war on the ground in Iraq that should be commanding our attention. The six British soldiers killed last week, like the US servicemen under daily attack, are victims of an overbearing and inept occupation policy that is alienating ordinary Iraqis of all persuasions.

Civilian deaths, particularly of demonstrators, are mounting. Basic services and basic rights are in scant supply, with neither democracy nor a reliable water supply on offer to Iraqis. The only advanced programme is for the privatisation of state industry. This occupation, which has no modern precedent, should be at the centre of political attention. Ending it needs to be at the heart of public activity.

Tony Blair has placed Britain at the service of the first major post-1991 attempt to fasten foreign domination by force on a sovereign country, an endeavour as unlawful as it is unwise. And there is no easy way out for the government. British troops in Iraq are now hostages to the Middle East policy of the Bush administration and its boundless appetite for domination.

As the occupation of Iraq increasingly appears to be a springboard for a fresh regime-change offensive against Iran, the British troops controlling the Shia-dominated south of Iraq will be seen not merely as uninvited occupiers but as aggressors against their co-religionists as well.

If the recent warnings of Washington uberhawks Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton - that military action against Iran is a live option - become fact, British forces will be caught up in the campaign, like it or not. And how often have the musings of maniacs become official Bush administration policy faster than you can say "pre-emptive war"?

It is certainly hard to see Bush willingly withdrawing the forces of his "coalition" from Iraq without first having a crack at toppling the Iranian government. Indeed, the US has no strategy for pacifying Iraq that does not involve challenging Iran. Thus is the traditional logic of 19th-century empire being replayed in the 21st: protecting one conquest requires an indefinite extension of conflict.

Tony Blair seems to be up for this - committed as he is to his own version of the "white man's burden", imposing New Labour values of market efficiency and moral hectoring on the world for its own good. He shows no signs whatever of wanting to unhook Britain from George Bush's endless war against the "axis of evil" and beyond.

Geoff Hoon, for example, when not pledging thousands more troops to the Iraqi quagmire, has signalled a British willingness to sign up for the entirely lawless and manifestly dangerous US plan to board and search by force North Korean ships on the high seas.

But are the millions who marched against the Iraq war ready to acquiesce in the continuing, connected crises of the Iraqi occupation and plans for renewed war? Parliament may be dozing; but the public is increasingly alarmed. The anti-war movement is once again gaining momentum, its aim both to prevent the next war and indict the government for the now transparent lies it told to justify the last one. But it is also to work for Iraq to be returned to the Iraqis, lifting the burden of Bremer's bullying from the backs of a suffering country. It is time for British politics - the labour movement above all - to wake up to what is being done in our name.

Last week's killings in Majar al-Kabir will be only the beginning unless the government is held to account for its subordination to the "new American century" project.

Dead British soldiers - but no weapons of mass destruction discovered. The balance sheet of Blair's Iraq adventure is deteriorating fast. Yet the prime minister is to accept a Congressional gold medal for his part in imposing George Bush's will on Iraq. He will not be doing so on behalf of the British people. Perhaps Alastair Campbell should recommend a private ceremony.

* Andrew Murray is chair of the Stop the War Coalition.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.