Global Policy Forum

Ukraine in Turmoil as Agreement Crumbles

Print

By Michael Steen

Common Dreams
December 7, 2004

Ukraine's outgoing leader denied on Tuesday he had agreed on concessions with his opponents to end a crisis that has plunged the country into turmoil and driven a wedge between Russia and the West. Russia and the United States clashed over their efforts to win influence in Ukraine, with Moscow warning the West against interfering in former Soviet states -- a region it considers to be its backyard. Washington rejected the charges.


In the latest setback for international mediation efforts to reconcile an opposition that has mobilized hundreds of thousands of protesters and President Leonid Kuchma, the veteran leader reversed his stance on concessions within a matter of hours. Last month's election, rigged by the authorities to hand power to Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich, pushed the country into two weeks of political and economic chaos. The Supreme Court backed opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko's charges that the poll was tainted by fraud and set a re-run for Dec. 26.

Some progress appeared to have been made in the early hours of Tuesday after a marathon "round-table" negotiation brokered by European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana when Kuchma told reporters he would meet two of three opposition demands. But, in a written statement hours later, he said: "If we are to speak in general terms, no agreement was reached and instead of a statement from the round-table talks, there was simply a statement for the press."

He said Yushchenko's Our Ukraine group had stalled the talks by insisting on the dismissal of the government, but opposition leader Petro Poroshenko said the authorities were seeking to deepen the crisis. The economy showed further signs of trouble. The Treasury said the budget deficit widened from zero to a $1 billion in September and October, or two percent of gross domestic product.

U.S. Denies Seeking Influence

The crisis has also rekindled old Cold War tensions.

Russia, for centuries Ukraine's imperial master, was taken aback by fierce charges from the West of vote rigging in the Nov. 21 poll and congratulated its preferred candidate, Yanukovich, even before he was officially named winner. On Monday, it did an about-turn and dropped public support for him. Tuesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the West of using election monitors to influence domestic affairs -- a thinly veiled criticism of what Moscow sees as Western interference in Ukraine.

Secretary of State Colin Powell flatly rejected the suggestion and took issue with Russia on many matters. "It is not a matter of (spheres) of influence, it is a matter of allowing a country to choose how it wishes to be governed and who it wishes to have as its friends," Powell said on a trip to Bulgaria.

In their stand-off, the opposition is demanding the sacking of the central election commission, new laws to prevent vote-rigging, and Yanukovich's dismissal. Kuchma, who said after the mediation talks he would agree to the first two demands, wants the opposition to vote for constitutional changes to cut the powers of the next president and give more power to parliament and the prime minister.

The opposition fears Yanukovich might use his government post to help his election bid. Analysts say Kuchma anointed him as a successor unlikely to support calls from hard-line opponents to prosecute him once he retires. But it has resisted moves to cut presidential powers. "Bill 4180 (to curb presidential powers) in its current form, allows parliament to take over practically all presidential powers," Yulia Tymoshenko, a close ally of Yushchenko told Russia's Nezavisimaya Gazeta. "If we approve it in full, presidential polls lose their point. There will be no difference who is president, because any president after such reform will be a ceremonial figure."


More Information on Empire?
More Information on US Military Expansion and Intervention

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.