Global Policy Forum

An EU-Like Pact for ASEAN:


By Carlos H. Conde

International Herald Tribune
January 28, 2007

For four years, Raul Umpad has been making guitars by hand. Working under the shade of a mango tree, often without a shirt because of the humidity and heat, he smoothes the wood using sandpaper. It is a dreary job, Umpad said. And the pay, about $4 a day, is not so good, but it supports his jobless wife and their four young children. "It would be so easy to complain about the low pay, but I count my blessings," Umpad, 38, said, rubbing sandpaper briskly on a pear- shaped piece plywood.

Umpad said he derived satisfaction from seeing his guitars bought by foreign tourists, who travel to his village from the bustling central Philippine city of Cebu and from neighboring resorts. Pajak, about 12 kilometers, or 7 miles, from Cebu City, is known for some of the Philippines' finest guitars, many of which are for export. When told that leaders of 10 Southeast Asian countries who gathered three weeks ago in a resort near here had agreed to accelerate the region's drive toward becoming a free-trade zone like the European Union, Umpad asked: "Is that going to be good for us?"

The leaders who attended the summit meeting, organized by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or Asean, drove home the point that creating a free-trade zone and an "Asean Economic Community" by the year 2015 would not only be good, but also the only way to go. But analysts have said that any serious attempt at an EU-like Asean should first address some of the issues that could undercut it: the huge income disparities among Asean nations, the political and cultural diversity and the lack of progress in many of these economies on trade liberalization, good governance and human rights.

In other words, Umpad and the millions like him who subsist on paltry incomes should not be misled into dreaming of an Asean utopia until the issues that make the region what it is - poor, backward, prone to political upheavals, among other problems - are resolved. To Haruhiko Kuroda, president of the Asian Development Bank in Manila, it is not a chicken-and-egg situation. Southeast Asia, he said, should bridge the income gap before it can even dream of becoming as integrated as the EU. And such an integration could happen, he said, only if countries were able to take advantage of the numerous free- trade agreements that had already been signed or were under negotiation.

Asean, he said, "must chart a clear road map of a regionwide FTA," referring to the leaders' commitment during the summit meeting of Asean and six other countries in Asia for a free-trade agreement in East Asia. That, he said in an interview, would spur development and reduce income disparity. Kuroda also underscored the need for Asean nations to improve their institutions and fight corruption, something that the World Bank echoed last week. "Excessive inequity and weak institutions may be the motive of crime, violence, political instability and conflicts, which are all deterrents of economic growth," Franí§ois Bourguignon, chief economist of the World Bank, said on a visit to Manila.

Corruption is a particular Asean weakness. Six of the 10 Asean countries - Laos, Vietnam, the Philippines, Cambodia, Indonesia and Myanmar - are among the 50 most corrupt states in the world, according to the 2006 Corruption Perceptions index compiled by the corruption watchdog Transparency International, which surveyed 163 countries. Experts have always contended that corruption has a tremendous impact on development. The perception of endemic corruption scares away foreign investors and "has a knock-on effect on economic growth," Huguette Labelle, chairwoman of Transparency International, said at the announcement of the group's 2006 rankings in November.

Then there is economic freedom. In its "2007 Index of Economic Freedom," released last week, the Heritage Foundation ranked four of the Asean countries - Cambodia, the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam - as "mostly unfree"; two countries, Malaysia and Thailand, as "moderately free"; and two, Laos and Myanmar, as "repressed." Singapore, which has long been viewed as a partly authoritarian state, is No. 2 on the global list as "free," following Hong Kong. Brunei, an Asean member, was not ranked. This month, Freedom House, which monitors political freedom around the world, decried the declining state of freedom in several Asian countries. It singled out Thailand, because of the recent military coup; the Philippines, not specifying a reason; and Myanmar, for its crackdown on critics.

Myanmar, in particular, is seen as Asean's Achilles' heel and Yangon has been accused of not doing enough to improve its human rights record. "As far as Burma, or Myanmar, is concerned, we all see clearly that it's not very helpful what the government there is doing as far as Asean is concerned," said Axel Raimund Weishaupt, the German ambassador to Manila. Myanmar's human rights record, he said, could slow down Asean's integration.

Others see the push for an EU-like integration, with the necessary disciplining mechanism, as precisely the kind of impetus Asean needs to make changes. "For Asean to follow on that path would give Asean a stronger capability in addressing the issues of democracy, governance and integration," said Alistair MacDonald, the British ambassador to Manila and head of the European Commission's delegation in the Philippines.

The Asean Civil Society Conference, a network of activist groups, that held its own "parallel summit" meeting in Cebu, said that integration could be hampered by what it called a lack of transparency in most of the trade negotiations, the results of which, it said, could have a detrimental impact on ordinary people. Ultimately, it said, the aim should be "genuine regional solidarity" rather than just economic integration.

Razeen Sally, director of the European Center for International Political Economy, in Brussels, is not a fan of an EU-like integration for Southeast or East Asia, primarily because, in his view, trade integration is being pursued at the expense of trade policy reforms. Sally argues that "trade policy matters more than trade negotiations." But governments in the region, he pointed out in a paper released in December, "are acting as if it were the other way round."

"They are relying too much on trade negotiations - particularly FTAs - while neglecting sensible trade policy reforms at home," he said, referring to free-trade agreements. This, Sally added, could hamper regional integration and economy progress. Among those reforms, Sally said, are genuine and tangible liberalization, transparency in domestic laws and regulations in order to improve market access and competition. Kuroda, of the Asian Development Bank, underscored this point in his speech before the leaders at the Asean Summit. Asean countries, he said, need to work harder to facilitate an effective cross-border movement of goods, services, capital, and people.

More Information on Nations & States
More Information on Political Integration and National Sovereignty


FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.