Global Policy Forum

Iraq-Niger Uranium Chronology

Print

By Paul Kerr

Arms Control Association
August 11, 2003

One of the chief arguments used by the Bush administration to justify the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was that Iraq was "reconstituting its nuclear weapons programs." Central to this argument was the claim that Iraq attempted to obtain processed uranium from Africa, and that it attempted to acquire specialized aluminum tubes to enrich that uranium. Debate continues about the accuracy of the second assertion. But President George W. Bush's inclusion of the first claim in his January 28, 2003 State of the Union address has become particularly contentious as evidence has emerged that it was based on discredited or misleading information. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice acknowledged June 8 that Bush's claim was based in part on inaccurate information, and the controversy intensified when White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer conceded July 7 that the information should not have been included in the president's speech. Several administration officials have accepted varying degrees of responsibility for the statement, including Rice, Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet, Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, and President Bush.


This chronology details the intelligence that the United States possessed on reported Iraqi attempts to obtain uranium from Africa, along with relevant administration statements.

2001-2002

Late 2001 - Early 2002: The United States gathers what Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet later terms "fragmentary intelligence" about Iraq's attempts to acquire uranium from Africa.

Late February 2002: The CIA sends former Ambassador Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate reports about Iraq's attempts to acquire uranium from that country. Wilson later writes in the New York Times (July 6, 2003) that "it was highly doubtful that any such transaction had taken place" because Niger's uranium industry is closely regulated by its government and is controlled by a consortium of foreign companies monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Wilson briefs this conclusion to the CIA when he returns in March, 2002.

Wilson also reports to the CIA that a former Nigerian official described a businessman's attempt to arrange a meeting between the former official and an Iraqi delegation as "an attempt to discuss uranium sales," Tenet says later (July 11, 2003).

CIA officials tell Wilson that his mission to Niger is in response to an interest expressed by Vice President Dick Cheney. Wilson tells CNN later (July 7, 2003) that Cheney's office "asked the question and that office received a very specific response." Tenet, however, claims later (July 11, 2003) that CIA experts sent Wilson to Niger "on their own initiative" and the agency never briefed Wilson's conclusions to senior administration officials. The CIA distributed a summary of Wilson's trip report to Intelligence Community entities on March 9, 2002.

March 1, 2002: The State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) sends a memorandum to Secretary of State Colin Powell stating that claims regarding Iraqi attempts to obtain uranium from Niger are not credible, according to a knowledgeable government official.

August 26, 2002: Cheney declares, "we now know that Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons…Many of us are convinced that Saddam will acquire nuclear weapons fairly soon." September 2002: The CIA expresses "reservations" to British intelligence about information regarding Iraqi efforts to acquire African uranium after the United Kingdom informs the agency about its plans to include the allegation in a forthcoming report about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, according to a later statement from Tenet (July 11, 2003).

September 24, 2002: The United Kingdom issues a report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program stating "there is intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Iraq has no active civil nuclear power programme or nuclear power plants, and therefore has no legitimate reason to acquire uranium."

September/October 2002: U.S. intelligence officials tell Senate committees about their differences with the British report regarding the Iraq/uranium claim, according to Tenet (July 11, 2003).

October 2002: The State Department acquires documents about the Iraq-Niger uranium deal and shares them with "all the appropriate agencies," according to department spokesman Richard Boucher (July 17, 2003). A senior administration official, however, claims (July 18, 2003) that the CIA did not receive the documents until February 2003.

Early October 2002: A classified National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a portion of which was later made public (July 18, 2003) states: "A foreign government service reported that as of early 2001, Niger planned to send several tons" of uranium to Iraq and "Niger and Iraq reportedly were still working out arrangements for this deal, which could be for up to 500 tons of yellowcake [lightly processed uranium ore]."

The NIE adds, "reports indicate Iraq also has sought uranium ore from Somalia and possibly the Democratic Republic of the Congo. We cannot confirm whether Iraq succeeded in acquiring uranium ore and/or yellowcake from these sources." The NIE also contains a State Department INR dissent which characterizes "claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa" as "highly dubious."

Rice does not read the INR dissent, according to a senior administration official (July18, 2003). October 5-7, 2002: Tenet calls Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley to request that a line referring to Iraqi attempts to obtain "substantial amounts of uranium oxide" be removed from a draft of a Bush speech scheduled for October 7. The CIA sends a memorandum to Hadley and White House speechwriter Michael Gerson October 5, asking them to remove a similar line referring to Iraq's attempted acquisition of "500 metric tons of uranium oxide from…Africa." The CIA also sends a memorandum to the White House October 6 providing additional detail about the Iraq/uranium claim and noting the U.S. Intelligence Community's differences with Britain over the intelligence. The memorandum is passed to both Hadley and Rice. Per the CIA's request, no reference to Iraqi uranium procurement attempts appears in Bush's October 7 speech. Hadley and White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett reveal these details in a July 22, 2003 press briefing.

December 19, 2002: A State Department fact sheet charges Iraq with omitting its "efforts to procure uranium from Niger" from its December 7 declaration to the United Nations weapons inspectors. UN Security Council Resolution 1441, adopted November 8th, 2002, required Iraq to submit a declaration "of all aspects of its [weapons of mass destruction] programmes." The declaration is supposed to provide information about any prohibited weapons activity since UN inspectors left the country in 1998 and resolve outstanding questions about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs that had not been answered by 1998.

The fact sheet is "developed jointly by the CIA and the State Department," according to a letter (April 29, 2003) from the State Department to Congressman Henry Waxman. Boucher later says (July 14, 2003) that the Niger information was "prepared in other bureaus of the State Department," but does not say which bureaus were involved. The fact sheet was not cleared by the State Department's intelligence bureau, according to knowledgeable sources.

The IAEA requests information from the United States on the uranium claim "immediately after" the fact sheet's release, according to a June 20, 2003 letter from the IAEA to Waxman. This information is not supplied until February 4, 2003, according to a later (July 1, 2003) State Department letter to Waxman.

2003

January 2003: White House staff members decide to include a reference to Iraqi attempts to procure uranium from Africa in the State of the Union speech. During a discussion about the intelligence on this matter, National Security Council staff member Robert Joseph insists that information about the uranium procurement attempt be included in the speech, according to later accounts from several U.S. senators investigating the claim. But Alan Foley, director of the DCI's Center for Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control, expresses concern about the intelligence. Foley eventually agrees to a change that appears in the final draft of the speech. According to Bartlett's later briefing, Tenet does not review the speech and Rice and Hadley do not recall the October memorandums or a phone call from Tenet while putting together the State of the Union remarks together.

Joseph later recalls the exchange differently believing it was only about a question of whether to cite the British report or the NIE in the State of the Union address, Bartlett says in his July briefing.

January 20, 2003: President Bush submits a report to Congress stating Iraq omitted "attempts to acquire uranium" from its December 7 declaration to the UN.

January 23, 2003: National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice writes in The New York Times that Iraq's declaration "fails to account for or explain Iraq's efforts to get uranium from abroad." A White House report issued the same day asserts that Iraq's weapons declaration "ignores efforts to procure uranium from abroad."

January 26, 2003: Powell asks, "Why is Iraq still trying to procure uranium and the special equipment needed to transform it into material for nuclear weapons?" during a speech in Switzerland.

January 27, 2003: IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei tells the UN Security Council that IAEA inspectors "have to date found no evidence that Iraq has revived its nuclear weapons programme since the elimination of the programme in the 1990s."

January 28, 2003: President Bush asserts that "the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" during his State of the Union address.

January 29, 2003: Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld states in a press briefing that Iraq "recently was discovered seeking significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

February 4, 2003: State Department officials give the IAEA the information the agency requested about Iraq's attempts to obtain uranium from Niger, telling the agency that it "cannot confirm these reports and [has] questions regarding some specific claims."

February 5, 2003: Powell presents evidence, based on U.S. intelligence, about Iraq's prohibited weapons programs to the UN Security Council. He does not mention Iraqi attempts to obtain uranium from Africa.

February 14, 2003: ElBaradei reports to the Security Council that "We have to date found no evidence of ongoing prohibited nuclear or nuclear related activities in Iraq," adding that "a number of issues are still under investigation and we are not yet in a position to reach a conclusion about them."

March 7, 2003: IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei tells the UN Security Council that the documents allegedly detailing uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are "not authentic" and "these specific allegations are unfounded."

March 9, 2003: Powell acknowledges that the documents concerning the alleged Iraq-Niger uranium deal might be false.


More Articles on Justifications for War
More Information on Iraq

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.