Picture Credit: iraq-businessnews.com |
Because the UN Security Council refused to endorse the US-UK invasion and occupation of Iraq in March 2003, Washington and London hoped to ignore the UN and operate with a free hand in the country. But a fierce Iraqi resistance, persistent economic and political problems, and continuing international criticism forced the US-UK to seek international partners for their enterprise, including assistance from the UN. A debate ensued between those who thought that the UN could be the wedge for internationalization and US-UK withdrawal and those who thought a UN presence would only discredit the world body. Following the adoption of Security Council Resolution 1483 two months after the war, then-UN Secretary General Kofi Annan appointed a Special Representative for Iraq and the UN assumed some small responsibilities there. Many critics warned, though, that the UN should not be identified with the illegal war and occupation.
In August 2003, a massive bombing of UN headquarters in Baghdad confirmed the critics' fears, killing fifteen UN staff including the Special Representative. The UN then pulled out of Iraq and kept its distance, but in February 2004, under heavy US pressure, the UN agreed to send a mission to the country, to help construct a new interim government. Again, Washington kept the UN's political role weak, while seeking legitmacy from the UN. After the establishment of an interim government in June, the US pressured the UN to take a larger role in planning national elections, but security dangers and reluctance by the Secretary General and UN staff kept the UN role to a minimum.
Now, as the situation spirals more and more out of control, Washington is citing the worsening humanitarian crisis as reason enough for the UN to step in. But critics say the US intends to use the UN to push Iraqis to accept US-imposed "benchmarks" for reconciliation, including a controversial oil law and debaathification. The new Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, seems to be more pliant to the US and more supportive of greater UN involvement in Iraq. Despite strong opposition from the UN Staff Council – which represents 25,000 UN workers – the Security Council succumbed to US and UK pressure and voted on August 10, 2007 to expand the UN's role in Iraq. Only if the US occupation ends can there be a substantial – and politically viable – UN role.
Articles
2011
Cutting Off UNESCO, U.S. May Endanger Programs in Iraq (November 16, 2011)
When UNESCO approved full membership for Palestine last months, the US immediately cut off all financing for the UN agency. The US pays 22 percent of the agency’s budget and an extra $2-3 millions for specific projects. Officials of UNESCO state that these cuts will put the agency’s programs in Iraq at risk, and regard this as a self-defeating move for the US. Important projects in Iraq include education, literacy training and special training to the judiciary. These projects depend on UNESCO money and will be halted or harmed by an overall budget cut. (New York Times)
2009
UNHCR in Iraq: NGOs Say Ready for More Responsibility (December 31, 2009)
2008
Security Council Extends Protection of Iraq's Assets (December 22, 2008)
UN's Iraq Report Still Missing Causality Count (December 3, 2008)
Massachusetts Congressmen Want UN to Replace US Soldiers in Iraq (June 26, 2008)
UN Body to Send Its First Iraq Envoy Since 2003 (February 18, 2008)
Oil for Iraqi Citizens (January 6, 2008)
UNHCR Iraq Situation: Supplementary Appeal 2008 (January 2, 2008)
2007
Government to UN: 'Don't Extend Mandate for Bush's Occupation' (November 9, 2007)
The Iraqi Parliament and the UN Security Council: Questions About Renewal of the MNF Mandate (November 5, 2007)
Taking Sides or Saving Lives: Existential Choices for the Humanitarian Enterprise in Iraq (June, 2007)
This report by The Feinstein International Center assesses the humanitarian efforts in Iraq. According to the report, the humanitarian response has been slow and insufficient, due in part to concerns about the security of humanitarian workers. The study found Iraqis were responsive to humanitarian assistance, but many perceived the UN and NGOs as part of Coalition forces and were suspicious of aid workers as "spies." The report recommends aid agencies distance themselves from MNF forces and ensure neutrality in order to gain the support of Iraqis. This is particularly important for the UN, if it is to overcome its "failure…to live up to its mandated humanitarian assistance and protection responsibilities in Iraq."
Iraqi MPs Challenge Coalition Mandate (November 13, 2007)
In this Inter Press Service article, Thalif Deen reports on the renewal of the UN mandate of the multi-national force in Iraq. Deen cites a letter from Iraqi parliamentarians calling on the Security Council to refuse an extension of the mandate. The letter which is signed by a majority of Iraq's parliament was not delivered to the Council as intended in April 2007 and was released early November 2007 by Global Policy Forum for the attention of Security Council members.
UN Challenges US on Illegal Air Strikes in Iraq (October 23, 2007)
The United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) calls on the US to investigate and make public the deaths of Iraqi civilians caused by US air strikes and raid operations. During interviews of Iraqi civilians, officials and journalists, UNAMI gathered information on the deaths of 88 civilians from US air strikes from March to June 2007. The US claims the air strikes target terrorists and not civilians. However, according to the UNAMI report, the number of strikes is on the rise and about 15 to 20 percent of all bombs miss their target by at least 40 feet. (Online Journal)
Report of the Secretary-General on the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (October 15, 2007)
UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon reports on the progress of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI). The Secretary-General summarizes the political developments in Iraq, citing political boycotts, assassinations, resignations and the formation of alliances. He criticizes the inadequate response by the Iraqi government to providing basic services to internally displaced Iraqis The report concedes that ongoing violence in Iraq impedes the work of the UN in dealing with human rights violations, including the plight of detainees held in Iraqi and MNF facilities. The Secretary-General suggests there is an opportunity for the UN to increase its role in Iraq, especially in the area of national reconciliation.
Iraq Seeks Long-Term US Security Pact (September 30, 2007)
Al-Maliki Says Iraq is Secure for Expanded UN Role (September 23, 2007)
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon says peace in Iraq cannot be achieved by military means and calls for regional cooperation to ensure the country "continues efforts at reconciliation." The call comes after a meeting between Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, the Secretary General, Security Council members, representatives of regional and international organizations and the Group of Eight leading industrial nations to discuss greater UN participation in Iraq. Commentators suggest, however, that the US and Britain are merely pushing Iraq's political problems onto the UN so that the coalition troops can pull out. (Mail and Guardian)
How Much Can UN Achieve in Iraq? (September 21, 2007)
The US suggests the UN increase the number of personnel in Iraq and promote dialogue and reconciliation between Iraq's political factions. However, UN officials are cautious about an expansion in staff as long as security remains so risky. (Christian Science Monitor)
UN Waits To Issue Its Report On Iraq (September 9, 2007)
US and UN Shift on Iraq (August 22, 2007)
UN Security Council Resolution 1770 expands the role of the UN in Iraq, should the security situation improve. This cautious approach reflects the UN concerns over the security of its staff in Iraq, four years after the bombing of UN headquarters in Baghdad. While the UN is planning to build a fortified compound in the capital, UN officials have warned that without a withdrawal of Coalition troops, UNAMI will be "doomed." The renewed UN commitment in Iraq puts the UN's legitimacy in question, as it comes to the aid of the US even though the Coalition invaded Iraq without a Security Council mandate. (Council On Foreign Relations)
A Dangerous Acquiescence (August 20, 2007)
Marking the four year anniversary of the bomb attack at the UN headquarters in Baghdad that killed 22 UN workers, Salim Lone recounts his experience as a UN spokesperson in Iraq. Lone is critical of Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon's deployment of 30 UN workers to Iraq to promote reconciliation noting the UN will only be effective if the US and UK withdraw completely from Iraq. The author acknowledges, however, that even an independent UN force "will carry no promise of success." (Guardian)
US Seeks UN Help With Talks on Iraq (August 10, 2007)
After failing to gain regional support for its policies in Iraq, the Bush administration is turning to the UN for assistance with the political process. Washington is struggling to garner cooperation from Iraq's neighbors, though it turned down calls in 2003 to engage in a regional forum. (Washington Post)
UN Staff Oppose Proposed Iraq Resolution (August 8, 2007)
A Rising Refugee Crisis (July 31, 2007)
The ongoing violence in Iraq has limited aid workers' access to the most vulnerable communities. UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs John Holmes calls for more action and resources to improve the plight of Iraq's refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs). In that same vein, Holmes urges that humanitarian efforts remain independent of any political, security or economic agenda. (International Herald Tribune)
The UN in Iraq – Handle With Care (July 27, 2007)
This article from the Century Foundation speculates that "if any outside intervener can help Iraqis regain peace and stability at this late date, it's probably the United Nations." But since most Iraqis blame the US military presence for the disaster in their country, a UN role too closely aligned with Washington's agenda will only discredit the organization. Author Jeffrey Laurenti cautions that without a complete US withdrawal from Iraq, the UN will likely fail to resolve the crisis.
Why the United Nations Belongs in Iraq (July 20, 2007)
Dilemma for UN in Expanding Iraq Presence? (June 12, 2007)
In his quarterly report to the Security Council, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon explores ways the UN could expand its role in Iraq. The UN has had a minimal presence in Iraq since the 2003 bombing of UN headquarters in Baghdad. Critics warn that an increased UN presence would identify the organization with the US occupation, as the UN depends on Coalition forces for its security. (IraqSlogger)
Is US Eyeing UN as Dumping Ground for Iraq? (June 7, 2007)
UN Team Still Looking for Iraq's Arsenal (June 2, 2007)
Bush May Turn to UN in Search for Iraq Solution (May 23, 2007)
UN Report on Human Rights in Iraq Draws US Denunciation (April 26, 2007)
Nations Balk at Compact for Iraq (April 25, 2007)
Brokered Peace (March 27, 2007)
UN Chief Shaken by Baghdad Explosion (March 22, 2007)