Global Policy Forum

Now Butler Admits UN May Have Fed Iraqi Secrets to US

Print

By Mark Riley

Sydney Morning Herald
January 9, 1999

The Australian arms inspection chief, Mr Richard Butler, has conceded that intelligence gathered by his team in Iraq may have been secretly passed to the United States, but has denied involvement in any such exchange.

The concession comes as details surface of a plot to undermine Mr Butler's position at the United Nations and as US officials reveal that America did place intelligence officers inside Unscom, the team charged with verifying Iraq's compliance with UN disarmament resolutions.

According to US and UN officials, for almost three years the US monitored the radio communications of President Saddam Hussein's security forces, using equipment secretly installed by UN weapons inspectors.

As details emerge about how the US and the UN Special Commission (Unscom) shared resources, the plot to undermine Mr Butler appears to have backfired by forcing senior UN figures to voice support for him.

Mr Butler told the Herald that the UN Secretary-General, Mr Kofi Annan, had repeated his full support for him and his leadership of the weapons inspection regime.

Mr Butler acknowledged that intelligence may have been sent secretly from his units.

"The idea that somehow products of our work could be diverted to other purposes is theoretically tenable," he said. "But I have no knowledge of that."

At issue is the nature of any intelligence sent by Unscom inspectors to the US and whether it might have been used to aid a campaign to destabilise the leadership of Saddam.

A disgruntled former member of Unscom, Mr Scott Ritter, has claimed that intelligence was sent from the teams to the US, but only information relating to the system of concealment employed by Iraq to hide its weapons of mass destruction.

Mr Ritter is also the only person who has been prepared to go on the record with claims that Mr Annan has been wanting to sack Mr Butler.

But Mr Butler cast doubt yesterday on the accuracy of Mr Ritter's statements, saying he believed the former inspector was "very confused".



 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.