March 26, 2007
While South Africa voted reluctantly to impose new Security Council sanctions on Iran at the weekend, it also showed the world it sought to slow the momentum building towards confrontation between the West and Tehran. In its remarks to the council and its attempt to radically change the resolution, South Africa issued a warning that the strategy of pressuring Tehran over its controversial nuclear enrichment programme must somehow stop short of war. In his speech before the vote, ambassador Dumisani Kumalo said: "While South Africa recognises that the Security Council may be called upon to impose coercive measures such as sanctions, we believe these measures should be utilised with great caution, and only to support the resumption of political dialogue and negotiations to achieve a peaceful solution. "No one will win through a process of confrontation that can lead to disastrous consequences in a highly volatile region. This escalation is very worrisome." Referring to the invasion of Iraq, he said: "I was here some years ago when there was another issue that was escalating slowly like this one."
But Emyr Jones Parry, Britain's ambassador, dismissed South African amendments as "minor changes". The resolution adopted unanimously on Saturday by the 15-member council adds a few more sanctions to those adopted in December. These include freezing the assets of a major state-owned Iranian bank, Bank Sepah, as well as those of several firms owned by the Revolutionary Guards. It also blocks all Iranian arms exports and calls on governments not to make new loans to Tehran. - Independent Foreign Service