By Gawain Kripke
May 5, 20011. Introduction
2. Ecotax state of play. Ecotax analysis is more advanced than CTT tax, but is lagging in consideration of multi-national/global administration.
a. Ecotaxes have been implemented in several countries – especially Scandinavian countries, Germany, UK
b. Less discussion of harmonization, global administration
3. Environmental groups place a high priority on green taxes.
a. Synthesizes environmental and economic goals.
b. Embodied in the political coalition of German Social Democrats and Green Party
c. However, environmental NGOs have little experience in dealing with Finance Ministries or Departments of Revenue.
d. Many NGOs are looking at other economic signals from government policies. Reducing harmful subsidies for timber, oil and gas production, mining, etc.
4. Tax policy discussion is poisonous in the USA.
a. Many thinkers are trying to subvert this destructive dialogue by pursuing taxes by other names: auction, trade-able permits, fees, etc.
b. The idea of harmonization is interesting. There is potential to leverage action on ecotaxes in the USA through harmonization with other countries.
i. EU harmonization on energy taxes is a potential model – with Spain being a hold-out.
ii. Use of WTO or GATT?
5. Must start small – this is a lesson from ecotaxes.
a. Environmental taxes are usually sidelines to a larger mission. For example – environmental taxes are sometimes enacted to remediate environmental pollution or to support the cost of regulation. Environmental taxes are rarely enacted on their own.
b. Once enacted, environmental taxes tend to survive.
Contact: Gawain Kripke
Friends of the Earth-USA,
1025 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 300,
Washington DC, 20005,
202/783-7400x212,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
More Information on Energy Taxes
More Information on Global Taxes