Disputes with
Iraq over oil price kickbacks in 2001 led the US and the UK to demand stern UN
price-setting measures that soon led to falling Iraq oil sales and a dangerous
slump in revenue for the humanitarian Oil-for-Food program.
Oil
Pricing Disputes and Shrinking Humanitarian Revenue (August 6, 2002) This
excerpt from the report Iraq Sanctions: Humanitarian Implications and Options
for the Future discusses the dispute over the Iraqi oil pricing mechanism,
which leads to shortfalls in Iraqi oil exports and, consequently, a financial
crisis for the humanitarian oil-for-food program. (Global Policy Forum)
Statement by OIP Executive
Director Benon Sevan (September 25, 2002) This excerpt focuses
on falling Iraqi oil sales and its negative effects on the Oil-for-Food program's
growing revenue shortfall. Benon Sevan identifies the system of retroactive pricing
as one reason for this shortfall. (Office of the Iraq Programme)
Too
Early To Change Iraq Oil Price Policy (September 19, 2002) The US
and UK argue that they need more evidence of the cessation of illegal surcharges
and kickbacks for Iraqi oil before making changes to the current retroactive pricing
policy. Russia previously blocked British and French attempts to change the pricing
policy.(Reuters)
Oil Pricing Disputes and
Shrinking Humanitarian Revenue (August 6, 2002) This excerpt from
the report Iraq Sanctions: Humanitarian Implications and Options for the Future
discusses the dispute over the Iraqi oil pricing mechanism, which leads to shortfalls
in Iraqi oil exports and, consequently, a financial crisis for the humanitarian
oil-for-food program. (Global Policy Forum)
UK
Proposal For A Proactive Pricing Mechanism (July 11, 2002) The United
Kingdom proposes a proactive pricing system, which allows "Green List" companies
access to advance notice of prices at the end of every month. The proposal also
includes sharp limitations on companies that can trade in Iraqi oil. (CASI)
Disputes
Over Iraqi Oil Pricing Undercut Funding Of Oil-For-Food Program (June 27, 2002)
The UN oil-for-food program struggles with a shortfall of funds as Iraqi oil exports
decline due to a conflict over the pricing mechanism of Iraqi oil. Radio Free
Europe looks at this dispute and how it restricts the delivery of humanitarian
goods to Iraq. (Radio Free Europe)
French
Proposal for Iraqi Oil Pricing (June 21, 2002) France calls for
a "proactive pricing" system of Iraqi oil. According to the proposal, the UN Sanctions
Committee should set oil prices at the start of the month for the first 15 days,
then on day 15 decide whether to maintain those prices for the balance of the
month. (CASI)
Statement
by OIP Executive Director Benon Sevan (May 29, 2002) In this excerpt
Benon Sevan expresses his concerns regarding the price setting of Iraqi crude
oil. He argues that the continuing practice of retroactive pricing of Iraqi oil
by the 661 Committee, in combination with excessive premia demanded by Iraqi crude
oil contract-holders, lead to losses in revenue for the humanitarian program.
(Office of the Iraq Programme)
Paper
by the United Nations Oil Overseers (March 14, 2002) The UN Oil
Overseers, established by the UN Sanctions Committee, discusses the Iraqi oil
pricing mechanism and its consequences on Iraqi exports and revenues. It analyzes
efforts to reduce premia through measures to set the price of Iraqi oil close
to "fair market value" and to select customers on an integrity basis. (CASI)
Statement by OIP Executive
Director Benon Sevan (February 26, 2002) In this excerpt Benon
Sevan calls on the 661 Committee on Sanctions to turn attention to the humanitarian
program's financial crisis and the problems of retroactive pricing. Included are
also two annexes on allocation of total oil revenue, as well as oil proceeds and
humanitarian supply letters. (Office of the Iraq Programme)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.