This section includes articles on a wide variety of topic relating to Iraq, including background issues, policy considerations, and more.
2003 | 2002 | Archive
2003
Matthew Riemer discusses the US double standard regarding UN resolutions. It threatens Iraq with war for not fully complying with UN resolutions but when Israel breaks a resolution any preemptive measure is vetoed or neglected by the US. (Yellow Times)
The US government claims that the relevance of the United Nations and NATO depends on their capability to take action on Iraq. This Foreign Policy in Focus) article argues however that it is the relevance of the US position that is questionable.
In this publication, Phyllis Bennis answers questions about the Iraq crisis ranging from issues such as why the US rush to war, historical aspects and consequences of a possible conflict. The author also brings up alternatives to war and what the US response should include. (Institute For Policy Studies)
As the Bush administration promotes a new "economic stimulus" plan that would put money back into the hands of the obscenely wealthy, it is also stiffening up "welfare to work" requirements, cutting back on social services, and pursuing an extravagantly expensive campaign against Iraq. This ZNet article calls it by its name: a war on the poor.
As the US gears up for a multi-billion dollar war on Iraq, many soldiers and their families are barely scraping by. According to a recent US Defense Department survey, nearly half of lower-rank soldiers face "substantial financial difficulties," and many require food assistance. (Voice of America)
2002
"Haven't we been here before?" asks Phyllis Bennis, as she recalls how Washington already bribed and menaced Security Council members in the past to obtain their support for the US position, especially on Iraq. (ZNet)
The US has always known about Baghdad's deployment of chemical weapons and their use against his own people, especially during the Iran-Iraq War. "What did the US government do about it then? Nothing," reports The Nation, "until ‘gassing his own people' became a catchy slogan to demonize Saddam."
The text of the compromise agreement between Iraq and Kuwait on a pact of non-aggression. (Agence France Presse)
Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri supplies UN Secretary General Kofi Annan with documents questioning the legality of US actions against Iraq and seeks any response from the Security Council. (Associated Press)
The UN Charter unequivocally states: "in the absence of an attack, the [UN] Security Council alone can act." The Guardian argues that taking action against Iraq without UN authorization is not only illegal, but would also undermine international security.
As the Arab countries "don't want the Americans to package a new war [against Iraq] for them," they hope to distract US's attention in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian quagmire.(Independent)
Increased US diplomatic activity in the Middle East raised concern among the Arab countries that the US's real motivation is to avoid a two-front war by first quieting Palestine before dealing with Iraq. (Agence France Presse)
In order to avoid the worst-case scenario of military confrontation, the US State Department hopes that the weakening Iraqi support by France and Russia can send important signals and induce change in Saddam Hussein's regime. (Boston Globe)
In an editorial for the London Times, British Foreign Minister Jack Straw praises the virtue of "smarter sanctions" and the drafting of a new Goods Review List, passing the blame to Saddam Hussein.
Government legal experts condemned US-UK attack on Iraq as illegal without a new UN mandate. The advice has led the Foreign Office to warn Blair that a fresh UN resolution could best ensure Russian and moderate Arab support for any attack against Saddam Hussein. (Independent)
The new US doctrine assesses "defense needs in terms of others' capability, not in terms of the actual threat they pose. " However, the UN Security Council, which exists, and is fully mandated, to deal with precisely such threats, should deal with the potential threat to peace and security posed by Iraq. (International Herald Tribune)