Global Policy Forum

Does The UN Have A Coordinated

Print
Global Witness
December 10, 2002

United Nations Lifts Diamond Sanctions On Angola But Keeps Sanctions On Sierra Leone Diamonds, Meanwhile Congo Still Has No Diamond Sanctions. Does The UN Have A Coordinated Conflict Diamond Policy?


Global Witness is concerned that the United Nations appears to be re-applying and lifting targeted diamond sanctions in an arbitrary and uncoordinated manner. On 26 November, the UN Security Council voted to keep sanctions on the export of rough diamonds from Liberia, and to renew its arms embargo on the government of Charles Taylor. (1) In a parallel move, the Security Council voted on 4 December to extend the ban on diamond exports from Sierra Leone unless they have a government certificate of origin. (2) In a contradictory move on Monday 9 December the Security Council voted to lift the 9-year-old sanctions on UNITA's diamond mining and selling operations and also lifted the arms embargo.

It is alarming that the United Nations has lifted sanctions on UNITA. In December 1998 Global Witness brought to the worlds attention to how UNITA had generated $3.7 billion in revenue through the illicit sale of conflict diamonds through major diamond companies such as De Beers and in the world's diamond trading centres. This expose led directly to the worldwide effort to curb the trade in conflict diamonds, which has culminated in the establishment of the Kimberley Process import and export control regime due to launch internationally on 1 January 2003.

The UN Angolan sanctions Monitoring Mechanism's own report of October 2002 found that UNITA still possess large quantities of conflict diamonds and illegal weapons. Diamond smuggling continues at $1 million per day. It is absurd that the United Nations agreed to the lifting of diamond and arms sanctions on UNITA, even if it is linked to the Lusaka Protocol agreement.

"The international community must maintain an unequivocal stance against the Angolan criminal networks, including the Angolan Armed Forces and their Generals that are still trading in illicit diamonds mined in Angola. The United Nations are repeating mistakes paralleled with Cambodia when the former Khmer Rouge commanders were allowed to become warlords by generating large amounts of illegal cash through the illicit timber trade. The international community are allowing warlords to be created in Angola in a similar fashion, with access to huge financial resources from diamonds and huge stockpiles of weapons, and the consequences could be dire" said Alex Yearsley, Campaigner at Global Witness.

In a separate move it is encouraging that the Belgian government are opening criminal investigations against two individuals named in the recent UN Expert Panel Report on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The report devastatingly exposed the plunder of natural resources in that conflict-torn country. The Belgian police recently arrested Jacques Van den Abeele, accused with his business partner, Aziza Kulsum, of smuggling coltan in collaboration with the Rassemblement conglais pour la democratie (RCD) rebel movement. The Swiss authorities should also be applauded for agreeing to freeze bank accounts allegedly belonging to the pair.

"The Belgian government's action shows that governments whose nationals are proven to be fuelling conflict and instability can act. The UN should make public, where possible, the information it holds on individuals and companies involved in plundering resources from DRC, so that governments can investigate the allegations and, where there is compelling evidence, instigate criminal proceedings", said Yearsley.


More Information on Conflict Diamonds
More Information on Sanctions

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C íŸ 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.